Mental Health: Social Media is less effective than expected

Social media is not important for mental health. This writer presents a new study by American psychologists Christopher Ferguson and his team. Zudem de Wissenschaftler de “gesellschaftlichen Anführern” een moral Panikmache vor.

The team has investigated the social media activities on the enormous amount of health of minors, which can be published in recent years.

The meta-analysis is assessed by the research on the quality of the result. These are cruder in nature than the Australian only Wissenschaftler, Befürworter and political Entscheidungsträger. “If you position yourself during the party, the problem is no longer the problem that occurred, while it was the previous time,” wrote the Forschenden in der Konklusion ihrer Arbeit.

The authorization of the research concerns the use of others on social media with a “moral panic” that increases the marketability of the business activities or the generation of video images.

The research-oriented approach to social media is, perhaps, even more important than that, because the “academically aware moral panic that the society of pressing problems can reveal” can be.

The biggest criticism, the ferguson and my lectures are focused on studying, it is worth spending the time, the man on social media. It is possible that there is a malfunction. The less fragmented it is, the less social media is used and from any green environment.

If we want to understand the social media, if man is concerned, “on the art of inhaling the nutzer or with the interacting (was), the arten of verhaltensweisen or interaktionen, and it is teilnehmen (who), and warum sie soziale Media zu einemten Zeitpunkt nutzen (warum)».