WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to allow Trump’s former White House chief of staff Marcos Prados move the election interference case against him in Georgia to federal court.

Meadows was one of 19 people accused in Georgia and accused of participating in an illegal scheme to keep then-President Donald Trump in power after he lost the 2020 election. Trump was also charged, although after he won reelection last week to a second term, any trial appears unlikely, at least while he is in office. Both men have denied wrongdoing.

It is unclear what effect the election results might have on other defendants in the case, which is largely on hold after an appeals court agreed to review whether to eliminate Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis for her romantic relationship with the special prosecutor she had hired to lead the case.

Meadows had gone to the Supreme Court in an effort to remove the charges from Georgia courts. He maintains that the case belongs in federal court because it relates to his duties as a federal official, and pointed to the Supreme Court ruling granting Trump broad immunity from criminal prosecution to support his argument.

“A White House chief of staff facing criminal charges based on actions related to his work for the president of the United States should not be a difficult decision, especially now that this court has recognized that federal immunity affects evidence that can be considered, not just what conduct can form the basis of liability,” his lawyers wrote.

But prosecutors said Meadows did not demonstrate that he was performing official duties during the alleged scheme, including participating in a phone call in which Trump suggested that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger could help “find” the votes he needed to win the state.

They argued that the case should remain in Georgia courts and that Meadows can raise immunity defenses there. Prosecutors also rejected the claim that the charges could have ripple effects on other federal officials.

“Your references to the heated words of op-eds cannot be sufficient to demonstrate that a new era of ubiquitous prosecution of former federal officials is approaching,” the government lawyers wrote.

A U.S. District Judge and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. ruled that the case against Meadows and some of his co-defendants should remain in state court. A federal judge has also refused moving an Arizona false elector case against him to federal court.

Four people have already pleaded guilty in the Georgia election case after reaching deals with prosecutors. The remaining 15, including Trump and Meadows, pleaded not guilty.